![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Moving in Together. Hi David My partner moved in with me approx 4 mths ago and we
Ruth, I have pondered for some time over what my reply to you should be as I have concern over your comments towards the end of your e-mail about the imbalance in your assets. My concern is that if you are asking questions of this nature, then there is still doubt in your minds about your relationship and you should not be talking joint mortgages yet. They say that when debt comes in the door, love flies out the window. Have you moved in together too soon? You have both been burnt before, so it is logical that you may take longer or have more difficulty trusting 100% in the other person second time around. I see it is imperative that you get your finances in order because there is nothing like financial problems to throw cold water on what might have been a burning love affair. I am not just talking about the equity issues you are asking about. Your weekly budget is just as important; maybe even more so. As I see it, the actual problem that you are looking for an answer to is really about not being sure your relationship is going to last. You have both decided to live together because it feels right, but the problem is that one of you has more material wealth to bring to the table than the other. You have moved in together but you still have 'MINE' issues to resolve. It would have made a lot more sense if these issues had been resolved BEFORE you moved in together but love and logic are firmly lodged at the opposite ends of a spectrum so lets talk about what to do now you are in this situation. You realise that if it does not work out, you could be the biggest loser. You might get ripped off! Your partner can see this too and it sounds like he wants to assure you that he is genuine, but how can he absolutely guarantee that to you? Hollywood movie stars sign pre-nuptial agreements but there is something a little 'off' about that. It is like saying, "I'm sure we are in love and want to spend the rest of our lives together, but just in case we discover we are wrong we'll sign here to say that it was for love and not for money". It almost sounds like a really loving thing to do until you realise that the one with all the money is really saying "I'm happy for you to be mine and I'm yours, but my money isn't." So a prenuptial agreement may be an answer to consider but it doesn't sound like you are planning on marriage yet so I suspect that it is not a solution at all. Maybe a pre-mortgage agreement is a possibility? You could ask a solicitor but gee it is not high on my list of 10 ways to have a romantic outing! I wondered if you should sell your house and then purchase one together. You could then put equal amounts in and remove that inequity that exists at the moment. Your surplus money could be placed into a trust account that only you are the trustee of. You could invest the money from your trust account separately and the two of you would have equal ownership in your new home. The down-side would be that the mortgage would be bigger than it really needs to be because you are keeping your surplus money separate. You could use the income from the trust investment to help repay the mortgage but the return on your investment is likely to be less than what you would save if you borrowed less so this is not ideal either. The other problem is that you said you love your house! You can't get away from it, if you love this man and you stay together, he will benefit financially from the union. Come to think of it, so will you, but just not as much! I doubt that you have a problem with the imbalance in the benefits if the relationship lasts. I sense that the problem is more that you are not sure yet that you will be together 'till death us do part'. Until you are sure, I strongly recommend that you do not have a mortgage together and that he does not contribute to your mortgage repayments. If you allow this to happen you will be setting yourselves up for a bitter dispute over money if it does not work out and it gets ugly. Of course, it was logical financially for you to start living together because now you only have the cost of one home between the two of you. Previously you had the cost of two houses. Your new partner would have been paying rent, so a more sensible idea would be for him to pay rent to you for living in your house. You could put that money towards your mortgage repayments. Then there would never be a question of you owing him money if you don't stay together. He was just a boarder! Of course the problem then becomes; at what point do you stop asking for rent? When you feel sure that your relationship is strong enough to last? How do you decide that? Does he stop paying rent when you get married (assuming that that is a possibility)? Maybe a better alternative would be for him to pay for the groceries, fuel, insurance car registration etc and then your income is freed up to pay the mortgage and there is still a clear line of separation until you feel safer about the imbalance. This then raises the question, "What should he do with his savings until you are both sure you will stay together"? Should he put money in a trust and invest it and use the income to help him pay for groceries etc? At every turn it comes back to the one thing; Love and Trust. You are ready to live together so you feel your relationship is strong enough to risk an emotional loss should it go pear-shaped but the problem is around the question, "Are you ready to risk financial loss?" I have some other thoughts that keep coming to mind that you should think about as well... Why do you have a lot more money than your partner does? Did your prosperity come from a property settlement after your previous relationship? Did your partner get screwed over by his ex-wife and you fared much better? Could it be that your good fortune was due to more favourable property settlement circumstances? If so, do you really have the right to be concerned about the financial imbalance? Were you just lucky? What if you were the one with fewer assets to bring to the table? Would your partner be concerned by the financial imbalance or would he be happy to accept you with whatever you have to offer? Is your partner worse off financially because he is lazy or does he deserve to be blessed financially through having met you? Would you still be as happy together if you had no money and no house and were starting from scratch? If you aren't happy without money you will not be happy with it! I will leave you with this thought... When neither of you care if one of you benefits financially from your relationship if it should end, then you are ready to move forward as a couple rather than two individuals living together! I hope this helps!
P.S. If you do decide to keep your house and you do refinance the mortgage to a lesser amount using his savings, he is then the one taking all the risk because I expect the house is in your name only. If you want to add his name to the title at any time
you may have stamp duty to pay so that may be another issue you will have to
consider if you want to jointly own the house. Stamp duty would be payable if
you purchased a new house and if you sold your house there would be agents
commission to pay so keeping your house has a lot of merit if you can sort out
the other issues. Some other comments that apply to this issue:- In a perfect relationship there would be absolutely no question about asset ownership. The problem is that we do not live in a perfect world. People get used and hurt by others and usually by those who are supposed to be the closest to them. Without a doubt, one huge weakness we humans have is around relationships. No matter how you look at it, there is no getting away from the fact that love and trust are Siamese twins that cannot be separated. As you love more, you entrust more of yourself to the other person and you become increasingly vulnerable in the process. There is no way you can enter into a loving relationship without becoming exposed. You allow another person to come into your 'inner sanctum' and as you allow them in, YOU have to move out to make room. While there is still a 'YOU' in there, the job is not complete. Of course, in that perfect world there would be no need to worry about "will I lose my shirt if I give absolutely ALL of me away" because in response, your partner would be giving everything of them to you in return. I know that sounds all gooey and fluffy and idealistic like it came straight from a wedding script but it is the truth. Every one of us knows we humans do not have a perfect love for anyone. Most of us try our best but we fall way short of the mark, only giving because we expect something in return. There is always still something for US in our giving. There really was a lot of merit in the old fashioned systems and values around marriage that the baby boomer generation has chosen to throw out the window and it is obvious that while those systems and values came primarily from Christian beliefs and principles, they were based on more than just religious ideology. They were the blueprint for harmonious relationships in spite of our human failings. Finally here is some feedback relating to all things legal that came to me from another reader in response to the information above and I think it is good advice. Hi David |
|||
|
||||
Control your personal finance budgeting ! |